Six months ago a restaurant owner in Portland posted a story about his slowest season strategy on LinkedIn. Four hundred likes. Two hundred comments. Last week, he posted almost the same story — tighter, more specific — and got nine reactions and two comments.
That's not a coincidence. LinkedIn changed how much of its algorithm gives away to free posts from pages, and the slowdown is real across every industry and company size.
The numbers have shifted hard
LinkedIn publishes no official engagement benchmarks, but agencies tracking average reach across thousands of business pages report consistent drops:
- 2022–2023: Pages reached 5–8% of their follower count on average posts
- 2024: Reach fell to 3–5% for most posting patterns
- Late 2024 to present: Reach settling at 1–3% for typical company posts
What that means in real terms: a page with 10,000 followers that once reached 700–800 people per post now reaches 100–300. The platform did not get smaller. The feed got narrower.
Why LinkedIn made this choice
LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft and answers to shareholder returns. The business model depends on advertising revenue, and free posts that occupy feed space without converting to paid ads are strategically inefficient. So the algorithm got stricter.
The posts that still get reach tend to be:
- Personal profile posts from company founders and executives (not the company page)
- Posts that spark early engagement — comments, shares, not just reactions
- Carousel posts and video (format matters more now than it did)
- Posts from accounts with a pattern of engagement (active for months, not dormant then posting)
Notice what isn't there: posting on schedule, posting frequently, or posting anything. LinkedIn no longer rewards consistency if the posts don't trigger the behavior the algorithm wants to see — conversation.
Three choices: adapt, pay, or be quiet
For most small business owners, the adapted strategy is to shift from company page posts to founder posts. The co-founder of a plumbing company still reaches 8–12% of their network with a thoughtful post about the job market for tradespeople, where the same post from the company page reaches maybe 1%.
The second choice is to run ads. A $5 daily budget on a carousel post reaches the company's actual audience, not the 1% the feed will show for free. It's a floor, not a question mark.
The third choice — which works for some businesses — is to accept that LinkedIn as a publishing platform is closed to you unless you pay, and shift resources to platforms where organic reach hasn't collapsed yet. That is a real choice for some niches, not a failure of strategy.
If you're going to stay, do this
Post from the founder or decision-maker's profile, not the company page. Followers there are smaller but the reach is higher and the audience is actually your people.
Write posts that ask a question or contradict the reader's assumption rather than posts that announce something. A post that says 'here's why the price I charge is higher than my competitors' will get more engagement than 'we raised our pricing 12%.' The first one starts a conversation.
If you're going to use video, shoot it vertical and keep it under 90 seconds. LinkedIn's algorithm ranks video higher than text right now, but only if it holds attention.
Post when your audience is awake and bored, not when they are working. Early morning Eastern time on weekdays catches the checking-email-before-meetings crowd. Evening and weekend posts to people in North America underperform significantly.
Do not post every day. A thoughtful post twice a week will reach more people than five mediocre daily posts. The algorithm is sorting by conversation-starter now, not frequency.
The platform's next move
LinkedIn is likely to squeeze organic reach further. The trend for the past 18 months has been consistent: tighter, paid-preferential. If you have an audience there that matters to your business, treat it like any other platform where you have limited free access — make it count, or build an email list instead.
Does your business show up when AI answers?
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews are already answering the questions your customers ask. The $49 AI Visibility Scan shows you where you're cited, where you're invisible, and the three changes that move you first — a written report in your inbox within 48 hours. If nothing in it is actionable, you don't pay.
Run the $49 AI Visibility Scan →Share this article
Comments
Leave a comment